When Good Authors are Terrible People – On A. J. Finn, Orson Scott Card, and Responsible Consumption of Media

An article in The New Yorker detailing the dubious reputation of popular writer within the publishing world has been making waves recently. “A Suspense Novelist’s Trail of Deceptions” is a lengthy read, detailing the long and complicated personal history of Dan Mallory, pen name A. J. Finn, author of the breakout bestseller The Woman in the Window, which came out last year.


The main accusations stem around habitual dishonesty regarding health problems for himself as well as family members, with Mallory allegedly going so far as to lie about the death of a parent from cancer. Often this was done to garner sympathy and give Mallory an edge over other students, or, later, coworkers, to get time off work, and generally manipulate those around him. When he was thrust into the spotlight in the aftermath of his novel’s success, Mallory’s embellishments turned to his past accomplishments.

He said that, while he was working at an imprint of the publisher Little, Brown, in London, between 2009 and 2012, “The Cuckoo’s Calling,” a thriller submitted pseudonymously by J. K. Rowling, had been published on his recommendation. He said that he had taught at Oxford University, where he had received a doctorate. “You got a problem with that?” he added, to laughter.

Mallory doesn’t have a doctorate from Oxford. Although he may have read Rowling’s manuscript, it was not published on his recommendation. (And he never “worked with” Tina Fey at Little, Brown, as an official biography of Mallory claimed; a representative for Fey recently said that “he was not an editor in any capacity on Tina’s book.”)

The book blogging community, which had previously been gaga over The Woman in the Window, reacted with horror. Dan Mallory is the latest high-profile example, but readers (and consumers of all types of media) have long been grappling with the implications of the moral shortcomings of artists. With the advent of the internet and particularly social media, these issues are brought to forefront more and more often. From Ender’s Game author Orson Scott Card’s rampant homophobia to allegations of sexual misconduct by Maze Runner author James Dashner, the age old question is this: can we separate the artist from the art? 

Put another way: Is consumption complicity? By making the choice to purchase, discuss, or even promote an artist’s work, are we, in some small measure, aligning ourselves with their behavior?

This all comes down to a matter of opinion, and for me, the answer is: “It depends… on a number of factors.”

1. Is the artist still alive?

This can be one of the biggest swaying factors for me. If the artist is no longer around to benefit from their fame and influence, the lines get a lot fuzzier in terms of moral failings I can dismiss long enough to read a book. The further you go back in history, the more this can become almost a necessity. If I’m reading the work of someone who died in 1925, odds are they held a lot of moral positions I don’t agree with. Values have (thankfully) changed a lot since then.

This doesn’t mean, however, that I feel I have license to shut my brain off while enjoying an older novel. As with any media, it’s important to think critically about implicit messages in the narrative.

2. Are you paying for their work?

Say the artist is still alive and kicking and I don’t feel comfortable giving them my hard-earned money. No, I’m not about to advocate for piracy. (You do you, though.) If I’m on the fence about an author morally, I may feel less qualms about borrowing the book from a library or a friend who already purchased it, or purchasing it second hand. If it’s a movie, maybe I’ll watch if it happens to be on TV, but I’m not going to run out to the theater or pay to stream it. Things that minimize how much money you’re putting in their pocket are going to change the equation.

3. Are you consuming media as a private consumer or an “influencer?”

Even if you’re not buying the work yourself, could you be influencing other people to do so? Maybe you got the book from the library, but then you posted a picture of it and gushed about how amazing it was to your 10,000 Instagram followers. I don’t have a huge audience, but I do try to be mindful of what I put out there if I’m aware of an issue with an artist.

4. Are the artist’s biases relevant to the work in question?

To me, this is equally important to the issue of whether or not they’re benefiting from my consumption of their work. I could find an abandoned copy of a book laying on the sidewalk, but if it was a novel with themes of love and acceptance written by someone who’d been outed for using racial slurs… I’m not going to read that. Compare that to visiting an art museum to view still life artwork by a long-dead artist whose attitudes about other races and women probably didn’t bear much of an impact on that painting of flowers in a vase.

I want to know what you think.

These are my opinions, but I think these things come down to a personal choice. What factors in relation to an author impact whether or not you’re willing to read their work? Are there authors you’ll pick up at the library but don’t want to support financially? Or do you choose what to read totally independently from your feelings about the author as a person? Let’s discuss!


Other places to follow me…
Tumblr | Facebook | Instagram | GoodReads


8 thoughts on “When Good Authors are Terrible People – On A. J. Finn, Orson Scott Card, and Responsible Consumption of Media”

  1. This is something I’ve been thinking about a lot recently, I read The Woman in the Window back in August before this came to light, and while it wasn’t my favorite book, I did still enjoy it. That said I don’t feel comfortable recommending it to anyone. I feel like it’s a really complicated situation though, as I honestly don’t research or know a lot about most of the authors I’ve read personal lives.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I don’t generally make a point to research it, either. With the AJ Finn thing, it was very high profile, so it was difficult to run a book blog without hearing about it. As with anything, you could drive yourself crazy if you try to research the ethics of every single decision. I read a LOT of books, and I’m not about to go into online sleuth mode before every single one. lol. But there’s a happy medium. Maybe you don’t necessarily seek out the info on your own, but you have to decide how to respond to the things you do hear.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. This is such an interesting discussion and one that has been on my mind lately as well. I know I’ve read controversial authors before but most of the time I didn’t find out after the fact.

    The reason this has been on my mind, is because I’ve been reading and enjoying the new DC Icons series. The 4th book recently came out and when I added it to my tbr on Goodreads, I saw people trashing the author. Apparently there are a lot of allegations against him and that’s not something I can easily ignore. So even though I really wanted to read the book, I can’t in good conscience read it now. I thought about checking it out from the library, but even then that’s good promo for him (if a lot of people check it out, then the library is more likely to buy more books by him).

    Ugh, it’s all one big moral mess. I’m interested in what others think on this subject. Wonderful, wonderful post!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your comment.
      I had to google what you were referring to in regards to the DC Icons author. The guy sounds creepy. =\ I can definitely see why you wouldn’t feel comfortable supporting his work.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. These are great points! I think whether a person is alive or not makes a big difference in my choice to read a book. If they’ve been dead for 100 years, their values and lifestyle might feel almost fictional in a sense. Whereas, like AJ Finn, I would not buy his book and really don’t even want to read it now because he’s a liar. 🤷🏼‍♀️

    Liked by 1 person

  4. […] Here is my discussion on the ethical consumption of media. What do you do when you have problems with an author’s personal beliefs or actions? Does it impact your likelihood to purchase their work? This was prompted by an exposé about A. J. Finn, author of The Woman in the Window, outlining a long history of alleged dishonesty. […]


  5. This post has me struggling to come up with an example of a line that would have to be crossed in order for me to avoid an author, musician, filmmaker, etc… Just when I think I’ve come up with one, I realize “Oh, wait, I bought that book by so-and-so.” Honestly it doesn’t come up much because the books I read are usually musty old sci-fi paperbacks from used bookstores.😀 Really, though, short of being a child molester, I can’t imagine any reason I’d avoid a book on moral grounds. If anything, I might see it as an opportunity to get into and understand the mindset of someone I fundamentally disagree with.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s